Understanding the Quantum Encryption Threat: How Quantum Computing is Undermining RSA Encryption
Understanding the Quantum Encryption Threat: How Quantum Computing is Undermining RSA Encryption https://torontostarts.com/2025/08/14/quantum-encryption-threat-rsa-security/ Apple -> https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/flowgrammer-podcast/id1804155588 Spotify -> https://open.spotify.com/show/0wv3feR00iaVpE8zn7niNf Flowgrammer.ca -> https://flowgrammer.ca/ AI News and Resources -> https://flowgrammer.ca/resources/ Future-Proof Your Business Today Don't let complex technology leave your business vulnerable. With Flowgrammer, get ready to leverage automation to stay ahead of the curve and protect your future. Automate critical tasks, increase resilience, and focus on building a secure and efficient operation. Learn About Automation Solutions https://flowgrammer.ca/ Startup Investor Drinks Toronto - https://startupdrinksto.com/ Toronto’s Startup Community - https://torontostarts.com/ Silicon Scoop Silicon Scoop Podcast - https://torontostarts.com/silicon-scoop/ Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/silicon-scoop/id1758711826 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5bAzF0MwV6TtLhJAhvHayI YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj4v-RoA7A-gT62vrEYqh1zCv-0Hj-o5J Startup Talk Startup Talk Podcast -> https://torontostarts.com/startup-talk-toronto-startup-podcast/ Apple -> https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/startup-talk/id1763804003 Spotify -> https://open.spotify.com/show/1siJMILILidHAiAsrX2VBU YouTube: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj4v-RoA7A-jxV5FHs5e61oIsuvUJYmT_&si=LYegRe5GYLKNQ7xL
With Craig Major and Jon Irwin

Understanding the Quantum Encryption Threat: How Quantum Computing is Undermining RSA Encryption
Estimated reading time: 15 minutes
Key Takeaways
- The quantum encryption threat is a significant challenge facing modern cybersecurity.
- Quantum computing’s ability to break traditional encryption systems like RSA poses a direct threat to data security.
- Recent breakthroughs demonstrate that quantum systems can crack encryption codes once thought unbreakable.
- Transitioning to quantum-resistant security measures is an urgent priority for organizations worldwide.
- Understanding the differences between quantum annealing and gate-based quantum computing is crucial for developing defensive strategies.
Table of contents
- Understanding the Quantum Encryption Threat: How Quantum Computing is Undermining RSA Encryption
- Key Takeaways
- Overview of Quantum Computing and Its Impact on Encryption Methods
- Case Study – Chinese Researchers Demonstrate Quantum Threat to RSA Encryption
- Implications for Data Security and Cybersecurity in the Quantum Era
- Strategies and Best Practices for Preparing for the Quantum Future
- Unlock Your Business’s Potential
- Frequently Asked Questions about Quantum Encryption Threat
Overview of Quantum Computing and Its Impact on Encryption Methods
Quantum computing represents a revolutionary computational paradigm that uses quantum mechanics principles to solve complex problems much faster than classical computers. Unlike traditional computers that use binary bits, quantum computers use quantum bits (qubits) that can exist in multiple states simultaneously.
Two main types of quantum computing systems pose different challenges to current encryption methods:
- Quantum Annealing Systems:
- Solve optimization problems by finding the lowest energy state
- Convert complex factorization challenges into Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems
- Currently available with over 5000 qubits in commercial systems
- Operating at extremely low temperatures for quantum coherence
- Gate-Based Quantum Computing:
- Uses quantum algorithms like Shor’s algorithm for factorization
- Theoretically more powerful but faces significant error correction challenges
- Requires fault-tolerant quantum computers not yet fully realized
- Represents the long-term quantum encryption threat
The impact on encryption methods is profound. RSA encryption, which protects most of our digital communications, relies on the difficulty of factoring large numbers. Classical computers would need thousands of years to break strong RSA keys, but quantum computers could potentially crack them in hours or days.
This quantum encryption threat extends beyond RSA to affect many current data security protocols. The mathematical problems that make classical encryption secure become trivial for sufficiently powerful quantum systems. This reality drives the urgent need for post-quantum cryptography—encryption methods designed to resist both classical and quantum attacks.
Current quantum computing research shows that quantum annealing can factorize numbers by reformulating them into QUBO problems using qubit energy minimization techniques. These technological advances are already being demonstrated in leading-edge experiments, proving that the quantum encryption threat is not just theoretical but actively developing.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674733424000123
Case Study – Chinese Researchers Demonstrate Quantum Threat to RSA Encryption
Shanghai University researchers led by Wang Chao achieved a significant breakthrough in demonstrating the quantum encryption threat against RSA encryption. Their research team used the D-Wave Advantage quantum annealing processor to successfully factorize a 22-bit RSA integer that had been resistant to previous quantum attempts.
Research Methodology and Achievement:
The team reformulated the factorization problem into Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems specifically designed for quantum annealing systems. This approach used qubit energy minimization to find the factors of RSA-encrypted numbers, representing a practical application of quantum computing against real encryption systems.
The methodology involved several key innovations:
- Converting traditional factorization into optimization problems suitable for quantum annealing
- Reducing qubit requirements per variable through optimized Ising model coupling
- Using multiple annealer runs with heavy classical preprocessing to achieve successful factorization
Technical Implications Beyond RSA:
The research demonstrated capabilities against more than just RSA encryption. The team showed their quantum annealing approach could also target SPN ciphers including Present and Rectangle encryption methods, expanding the scope of the quantum encryption threat across multiple cybersecurity protocols.
Comparative Analysis of Quantum Approaches:
Quantum annealing systems like the D-Wave Advantage offer current advantages over gate-based quantum computers:
- Available now with 5000+ qubits in commercial systems
- Stable low-temperature operation for quantum coherence
- Practical application to optimization problems
Gate-based quantum systems face different challenges:
- Require sophisticated error correction not yet fully solved
- Theoretical advantages using Shor’s algorithm for factorization
- Currently limited by noise and decoherence issues
Future Scaling and Development:
The D-Wave roadmap includes the upcoming Zephyr-topology processor expected to feature more than 7000 qubits, improving problem connectivity and potentially enabling attacks on larger encryption keys. This development timeline suggests the quantum encryption threat will continue evolving rapidly.
Expert Assessment of the Threat:
Everest Group analyst Prabhjyot Kaur warned that quantum advancements are “seriously threatening enterprise data security.” This expert commentary highlights how the quantum encryption threat is being recognized by industry professionals as an immediate concern for cybersecurity planning.
Regulatory Response and Warnings:
The White House has issued warnings about “hack now, decrypt later” attacks, where adversaries collect encrypted data today with the intention of decrypting it once quantum computers become more powerful. This threat model emphasizes the need for immediate action, including regular key rotation and preparation for post-quantum cryptography migration.
While the demonstrated attack targeted 22-bit keys that are smaller than the 2048-bit standards used in production RSA systems, the research represents a crucial methodological breakthrough. Historical precedent shows that encryption breaking capabilities often scale rapidly—DES encryption took only four years from initial successful attacks to complete practical breaks.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674733424000123
https://sciopen.com/article/10.14716/ijtech.v12i4.4782
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2021.618323/full
Future-Proof Your Business Today
Don’t let complex technology leave your business vulnerable. With Flowgrammer, get ready to leverage automation to stay ahead of the curve and protect your future. Automate critical tasks, increase resilience, and focus on building a secure and efficient operation.
Learn About Automation Solutions
Implications for Data Security and Cybersecurity in the Quantum Era
The quantum encryption threat extends far beyond RSA encryption to challenge the entire foundation of modern cybersecurity. As quantum computing capabilities advance, organizations must understand the broader implications for data security and begin implementing comprehensive quantum-resistant strategies.
Widespread Vulnerability Assessment:
Quantum advancements threaten multiple encryption standards simultaneously. Beyond RSA encryption, quantum systems have demonstrated capabilities against SPN ciphers such as Present and Rectangle. This broad vulnerability means that most current encryption methods protecting sensitive data will eventually become inadequate against quantum attacks.
The scope of vulnerable systems includes:
- Financial transaction encryption
- Healthcare data protection systems
- Government communication networks
- Cloud storage encryption protocols
- IoT device security mechanisms
Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards:
Post-quantum cryptography represents encryption methods specifically designed to remain secure against both classical and quantum computer attacks. These new cryptographic approaches use mathematical problems that remain difficult even for quantum systems to solve.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has accelerated the development of quantum-resistant standards:
- FIPS 203/204/205 standards released in August 2024 for lattice-based cryptography
- HQC (Hamming Quasi-Cyclic) algorithm selected in March 2025 for additional protection
- Continued evaluation of hybrid encryption approaches combining multiple quantum-resistant methods
Urgent Regulatory Response:
Government agencies worldwide recognize the immediate nature of the quantum encryption threat. The White House specifically warns about “hack now, decrypt later” attacks, where cybercriminals collect encrypted data today with plans to decrypt it once more powerful quantum computers are available.
This threat model creates unique challenges for data security:
- Information encrypted today may be vulnerable within 5-10 years
- Long-term sensitive data requires immediate protection upgrades
- Organizations must assume current encryption will eventually be broken
Enterprise Preparation Strategies:
Organizations need comprehensive cybersecurity strategies addressing the quantum encryption threat immediately, not when quantum computers become more powerful. Key preparation approaches include:
- Crypto-Agility Integration:
- Developing systems that can quickly switch between different encryption algorithms
- Creating infrastructure capable of rapid cryptographic updates
- Testing new encryption methods before full deployment
- Hybrid Encryption Systems:
- Combining lattice-based cryptography with traditional RSA for transitional security
- Implementing multiple layers of encryption using different mathematical approaches
- Ensuring backward compatibility while adding quantum-resistant protection
- Available Tools and Libraries:
- Open Quantum Safe library for testing quantum-resistant algorithms
- CRYSTALS-Kyber implementations for forward secrecy protection
- Hybrid encryption frameworks supporting multiple cryptographic standards
The quantum encryption threat requires immediate attention because the timeline for quantum computer development continues accelerating. Organizations that wait for “quantum-ready” solutions may find their data security compromised by the time quantum computers achieve practical code-breaking capabilities.
Data security in the quantum era demands proactive cybersecurity measures rather than reactive responses. The methodological breakthroughs demonstrated in quantum factorization research show that quantum computing capabilities are developing faster than many experts predicted.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674733424000123
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2021.618323/full
Strategies and Best Practices for Preparing for the Quantum Future
Organizations must implement comprehensive strategies to address the quantum encryption threat before quantum computers achieve the capability to break current encryption systems. Proactive preparation ensures continued data security and cybersecurity resilience as quantum computing technology advances.
Implementing Crypto-Agility:
Crypto-agility represents the ability to rapidly switch cryptographic algorithms and protocols when vulnerabilities emerge or new threats develop. This approach is essential for managing the quantum encryption threat because it allows organizations to adapt quickly as quantum computing capabilities evolve.
Key crypto-agility implementation steps:
- Design systems with modular encryption components that can be updated independently
- Create standardized interfaces for cryptographic functions across all applications
- Develop automated testing frameworks for validating new encryption algorithms
- Establish clear procedures for emergency cryptographic updates
Comprehensive Security Auditing:
Organizations should conduct thorough audits of their current encryption algorithms to identify vulnerabilities in the face of quantum threats. These assessments help prioritize which systems need immediate attention and which can wait for longer-term migration strategies.
Audit focus areas include:
- Inventory all systems using RSA encryption or other quantum-vulnerable methods
- Assess the sensitivity and longevity of data protected by current encryption
- Evaluate the technical feasibility of upgrading different system components
- Identify critical systems requiring immediate post-quantum cryptography protection
Hybrid Encryption Strategies:
Implementing hybrid encryption that combines current RSA systems with post-quantum algorithms provides immediate protection while maintaining compatibility with existing infrastructure. This approach addresses the quantum encryption threat while allowing gradual migration to fully quantum-resistant systems.
Hybrid encryption benefits:
- Provides quantum resistance without completely replacing current systems
- Allows gradual transition as post-quantum cryptography standards mature
- Maintains interoperability with partners and systems not yet upgraded
- Offers defense-in-depth protection against multiple attack vectors
Testing Emerging Standards:
Organizations should actively test and implement emerging standards and libraries such as CRYSTALS-Kyber and the Open Quantum Safe project. Early adoption of these tools provides valuable experience and helps identify integration challenges before full deployment becomes critical.
Recommended testing approaches:
- Set up isolated environments for evaluating post-quantum cryptography algorithms
- Conduct performance testing to understand computational overhead
- Assess compatibility with existing applications and databases
- Develop internal expertise through hands-on experience with quantum-resistant tools
Proactive Security Measures:
Beyond encryption updates, organizations need comprehensive cybersecurity measures addressing the broader implications of quantum computing advances. These measures help protect against immediate threats while preparing for the quantum future.
Essential proactive measures:
- Implement regular security audits focusing on quantum vulnerability assessment
- Stay updated with NIST guidelines and emerging post-quantum cryptography standards
- Develop relationships with cybersecurity experts specializing in quantum threats
- Create incident response plans specifically addressing quantum-related security breaches
Partnership and Collaboration Strategies:
The complexity of the quantum encryption threat requires collaboration with specialized experts and technology partners. Organizations should build relationships with quantum cybersecurity specialists who can provide ongoing guidance as the threat landscape evolves.
Partnership opportunities include:
- Working with cybersecurity firms specializing in quantum-resistant solutions
- Participating in industry consortiums focused on post-quantum cryptography adoption
- Collaborating with research institutions developing new quantum-resistant algorithms
- Engaging with government agencies providing quantum cybersecurity guidance
Timeline Considerations:
The quantum encryption threat timeline remains uncertain, but organizations should prepare for quantum computers capable of breaking current encryption to emerge within the next decade. This timeline demands immediate action rather than waiting for more mature quantum-resistant solutions.
Preparation should follow a phased approach:
- Immediate: Audit current systems and begin testing post-quantum cryptography solutions
- Short-term: Implement hybrid encryption for critical systems and sensitive data
- Medium-term: Full migration to quantum-resistant encryption across all systems
- Long-term: Continuous monitoring and updating as quantum computing capabilities advance
The key to successful quantum preparation lies in starting immediately with available tools and standards rather than waiting for perfect solutions. Early preparation provides valuable experience and ensures organizations can respond quickly as the quantum encryption threat becomes more immediate.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674733424000123
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2021.618323/full
Unlock Your Business’s Potential
Stay competitive in a changing world. Flowgrammer‘s automation solutions empower you to adapt quickly, optimize processes, and maximize your ROI. Reclaim your time, reduce operational costs, and accelerate growth with our tailored automation strategies.
Get Your Free Automation Assessment
Frequently Asked Questions about Quantum Encryption Threat
Q: What is the quantum encryption threat and how does quantum computing challenge RSA encryption?
A: The quantum encryption threat refers to the risk posed by quantum computing technology to traditional encryption mechanisms that protect our digital data. Quantum computers use quantum mechanics principles to solve certain mathematical problems much faster than classical computers, including the factorization problems that make RSA encryption secure.
RSA encryption relies on the difficulty of factoring large numbers—a task that would take classical computers thousands of years to complete for strong encryption keys. However, quantum computers using algorithms like Shor’s algorithm or quantum annealing techniques can potentially solve these problems in hours or days.
Recent research by Shanghai University demonstrated this threat practically by using D-Wave quantum systems to factorize RSA-encrypted numbers. While their demonstration targeted smaller 22-bit keys, it proved that quantum systems can break RSA encryption using real quantum hardware rather than just theoretical algorithms.
The quantum encryption threat is immediate because adversaries can collect encrypted data today and decrypt it once quantum computers become more powerful. This “hack now, decrypt later” attack model means that sensitive information encrypted with current methods may be vulnerable within the next decade.
Q: How does quantum annealing differ from gate-based quantum computing in threatening encryption?
A: Quantum annealing and gate-based quantum computing represent two different approaches to quantum computation, each posing unique challenges to encryption security.
Quantum annealing systems like D-Wave processors solve optimization problems by finding the lowest energy state of a quantum system. These systems reformulate factorization problems into Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems, using qubit energy minimization to find encryption keys. Quantum annealing advantages include:
- Currently available with 5000+ qubits in commercial systems
- Stable operation at low temperatures
- Practical application to specific optimization problems today
Gate-based quantum computing uses quantum algorithms like Shor’s algorithm for factorization. While theoretically more powerful, gate-based systems face significant challenges:
- Require sophisticated error correction not yet fully solved
- Limited by noise and decoherence in current systems
- Need fault-tolerant quantum computers for large-scale encryption breaking
Q: What steps should enterprises take to mitigate cybersecurity risks from emerging quantum threats?
A: Enterprises should implement comprehensive cybersecurity strategies addressing quantum threats immediately rather than waiting for quantum computers to become more powerful.
Essential preparation steps include:
- Crypto-Agility Implementation:
- Develop systems capable of rapidly switching cryptographic algorithms
- Create modular encryption components that can be updated independently
- Establish automated testing frameworks for new encryption methods
- Post-Quantum Cryptography Adoption:
- Begin testing NIST-approved post-quantum algorithms like CRYSTALS-Kyber
- Implement hybrid encryption combining traditional RSA with quantum-resistant methods
- Follow NIST guidelines including FIPS 203/204/205 standards for lattice-based cryptography
- Comprehensive Security Auditing:
- Inventory all systems using quantum-vulnerable encryption methods
- Assess data sensitivity and protection timeline requirements
- Identify critical systems needing immediate quantum-resistant protection
- Proactive Monitoring:
- Stay updated with evolving quantum computing capabilities
- Monitor government warnings about quantum threats
- Develop relationships with quantum cybersecurity specialists
Q: Are there tools available that can help measure or protect against quantum vulnerabilities?
A: Several practical tools and libraries help organizations assess and protect against quantum encryption threats:
- Open Quantum Safe Library: Provides implementations of quantum-resistant algorithms for testing, offers integration frameworks for existing applications, supports multiple post-quantum cryptography standards approved by NIST
- CRYSTALS-Kyber Implementations: Quantum-resistant public-key encryption algorithm, provides forward secrecy protection against quantum attacks, available in multiple programming languages and platforms
- Vulnerability Assessment Tools: Quantum vulnerability scanners that identify systems using weak encryption, risk assessment frameworks specifically designed for quantum threats, compatibility testing tools for post-quantum algorithm integration
- Hybrid Encryption Frameworks: Libraries supporting combinations of traditional and quantum-resistant encryption, migration tools for gradual transition to post-quantum systems, performance testing suites for evaluating quantum-resistant algorithm overhead
Organizations should begin experimenting with these tools immediately to gain experience before full deployment becomes critical. Early testing helps identify integration challenges and builds internal expertise for managing the quantum encryption threat effectively.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674733424000123
Q: How soon could quantum computers break current RSA encryption used in production systems?
A: While the exact timeline remains uncertain, experts estimate that quantum computers capable of breaking production RSA encryption could emerge within 10-15 years, with some breakthrough possibilities occurring sooner.
Current RSA systems use 2048-bit or 4096-bit keys, which are much larger than the 22-bit keys broken in recent quantum demonstrations. However, the mathematical principles remain the same, and quantum capabilities are advancing rapidly.
Key timeline factors include:
- D-Wave’s roadmap shows >7000 qubit systems expected by late 2025
- Gate-based quantum computers continue improving error correction capabilities
- Government agencies warn that sensitive data encrypted today may be vulnerable within a decade
Organizations should prepare immediately because the “hack now, decrypt later” threat means adversaries may be collecting encrypted data today for future quantum decryption.
Q: What is post-quantum cryptography and how does it protect against quantum attacks?
A: Post-quantum cryptography refers to encryption methods designed to remain secure against attacks from both classical and quantum computers. These algorithms use mathematical problems that remain difficult even for quantum systems to solve.
Unlike RSA encryption, which relies on factorization difficulty, post-quantum cryptography uses different mathematical approaches:
- Lattice-based cryptography using high-dimensional geometric problems
- Code-based cryptography relying on error-correcting code complexity
- Multivariate cryptography using systems of polynomial equations
NIST has standardized several post-quantum algorithms through FIPS 203/204/205, providing organizations with tested options for quantum-resistant protection.
Q: Can quantum encryption threats affect small businesses, or are they mainly an enterprise concern?
A: The quantum encryption threat affects organizations of all sizes, not just large enterprises. Small businesses often use the same encryption standards (like RSA) as larger organizations, making them equally vulnerable to quantum attacks.
Small business considerations include:
- Cloud services and online payment systems rely on quantum-vulnerable encryption
- Customer data protection requires quantum-resistant security measures
- Industry compliance may soon require post-quantum cryptography adoption
- Cyber insurance policies may require quantum threat preparation
Q: How does the quantum encryption threat relate to current cybersecurity frameworks?
A: The quantum encryption threat requires updates to existing cybersecurity frameworks to address this new class of vulnerabilities. Traditional frameworks focus on current threats but need expansion to include quantum considerations.
Framework updates should include:
- Risk assessment procedures specifically for quantum vulnerabilities
- Incident response plans addressing quantum-related breaches
- Compliance requirements incorporating post-quantum cryptography standards
- Training programs for security teams on quantum threat management
Q: What role do government agencies play in addressing the quantum encryption threat?
A: Government agencies worldwide actively address the quantum encryption threat through standards development, funding research, and providing guidance to organizations.
Key government activities include:
- NIST developing and standardizing post-quantum cryptography algorithms
- White House issuing warnings about “hack now, decrypt later” attacks
- Department of Defense funding quantum-resistant technology development
- International cooperation on quantum security standards
Q: How can organizations balance the costs of quantum preparation with uncertain timelines?
A: Organizations can manage quantum preparation costs through phased approaches focusing on risk-based prioritization rather than immediate complete system overhauls.
Cost-effective strategies include:
- Start with hybrid encryption for critical systems requiring minimal infrastructure changes
- Focus initial efforts on data with long-term sensitivity requirements
- Partner with vendors and service providers for quantum-resistant solutions
- Invest in crypto-agility infrastructure that provides benefits beyond quantum preparation
Additional Links
Flowgrammer.ca – 💡 Unlock AI-Powered Automation! Let flowgrammer.ca handle complex workflows so you can focus on growing your business.
- Silicon Scoop Podcast – Stay Informed, Stay Ahead!
- Startup Talk Podcast
- Flowgrammer Podcast –
- Startup Investor Drinks – Join Toronto’s Startup Community and connect with fellow startup enthusiasts and investors.
- TorontoStarts Startup and Entrepreneur Community – Become a part of Toronto’s thriving startup ecosystem.
- Workhaus – Discover flexible workspace solutions for your business needs.
- Work with The Startup Coach – Get expert guidance and mentorship for your startup journey.
- Reach out to Jon Irwin on LinkedIn – Connect with our co-host and technology expert.
Episode transcript
Read the full transcript
Craig: the landscape of digital security is rapidly changing. recent breakthroughs in quantum computing have created new challenges for traditional encryption methods. and we've talked about this for a while, but now we've got some facts here. the shift has introduced what experts call the quantum encryption threat, the growing risk that quantum computing poses to current encryption protocols like rsa. and now we're hearing that the chinese have a quantum computer that can break rsa. what's going on here, john?
Jon: yeah. apparently. so, before you start ringing the alarms and start worrying about everything, the chinese team only cracked a 22 bit key. so let me put that into reality for you. that's like picking a three digit lock. okay? so real world encryption using rsa uses 2,048 bit keys, which is the equivalent to a 600 digit lock. the disc like, the difference is astronomical, but it's very significant because they prove the concept works, and so they've got a path forward. so they use a quantum computer to break the rsa encryption. and so that's that's essentially what they did. for those of you that don't know what our rsa encryption, it's like a digital lock. protects everything. it protects your bank account, government secrets. it's used widely. now the security itself, it relies on a mathematical problem so hard that it would take classical computers thousands of years to solve. however, quantum computers work very differently, so they can theoretically solve these problems exponentially faster using an algorithm called shor's algorithm. so the achievement, yes, it does, i would say, accelerate the timeline for q d, right, or quantum d, which is the moment where quantum computers become powerful enough to break encryption. from everything i've read, estimate experts now estimate that this could happen anywhere between 2030 to 2040. now don't have to worry because they're already working on we've covered this many times. there's a bunch of different quantum, proof, encryption and algorithms that are being developed, and things will be changed over before that time. but what are your thoughts on this, craig?
Craig: hang on. sorry about that. i, yeah, i wanna put in perspective. like, we were talk we've been talking with this for a while about when quantum's gonna break all the existing encryption and what post quantum encryption might look like, as we've seen a few examples, and we've been talking about rsa, and we've been talking about, like, bitcoin and cryptocurrency encryption. so, you know, it's all on the chopping block. this shows that it's possible. we're limited by today's hardware, but what it's done is shifted the industry and saying, you know, we have fifty years left of rsa encryption to, oh, we've got twenty years left of rsa encryption. so they have to either up the keys like you're saying or build some new post quantum encryption in the next twenty years. so that's really accelerated, the industry towards what's gonna happen here. we need to invest heavily to get this replaced because rsa runs the internet. let's face it.
Jon: yeah. well, rsa encrypts the internet.
Craig: yeah. yeah. i say it runs the internet. but, like, you're not doing business on the internet without rsa.
Jon: yeah. yeah.
Craig: so you're not hiding your identity on the internet without rsa.
Jon: yeah. the other scary part about this beyond rsa is that they also apply the same method to substitution permutation networks, spn ciphers, such as, present and rectangle. and they are saying that it's the first time that a real quantum computer has posed a substantial threat to multiple full scale structured algorithms in use today. so it is scary, but still a ways away if that makes sense.
Craig: yeah. it's a ways away. this algorithm is still, the best, apparently. we're still limited by the number of qubits and how long our current quantum computing can hold the session before errors out. but it's happening, and we're seeing more and more threats. and, again, this is just one model that we're aware of. right?
Jon: yeah.
Craig: so the threat timeline has compressed significantly. like i mentioned, k, that quantum computers are capable of breaking rsa 2048 won't emerge for approximately another twenty years or so. and now they say it's gone from 50 to 30, and other articles i've seen has gone from 50 to 20. so it depends on who you talk to and what specifically. so it changes all that. and with that, we really have to get something in place because, you know, it doesn't seem like there's a standard solution today.
Jon: yeah. now the scariest part to this, though, is that, there's this strategy that's called harvest now, decrypt later. that is what i would say is the most immediate concern because these hacks are happening, and the these hackers are getting gigabytes, even terabytes of encrypted data that they're just gonna keep until they can decrypt it. so that's something to worry about. but who knows? yeah. it's it's one step forward for, for quantum computing, one step backward for, for encryption.
Craig: yeah. and, you know, the future of cybersecurity hinges on adopting post quantum cryptography standards earlier than expected, and post quantum encryption is no longer optional for high risk sectors like finance and government. they have to do this. and multiple quantum computing models will simultaneously attack different vulnerabilities in the current system. and hybrid encryption provides a pragmatic bridge between today's protections and tomorrow's risk. but when you use hybrid, there's usually leakage, side channels, all that kind of stuff to get to versus a pure encryption. that's something when you use hybrid. so we'll have to see. i'm curious to see what the next stage of encryption is gonna be. and yeah. with this kind of stuff coming out, we're going to start seeing, things competing for standards in the public space within the next five years.
Jon: yeah. like, again, this is a proof of concept breakthrough, not an immediate threat. okay? so they picked a three digit lock, whereas real security uses a 600 digit lock. so there's a huge gap there, and we've got a lot of time to bridge that gap.
Craig: yeah. but, i mean, we have a lot of time to bridge that gap, but it's not a lot of time in how the industry moves to adopt standards and gets it across. you know? yeah. how long is it gonna take to everybody to flip to a new encryption standard across the internet worldwide as an example. that's gonna take years. so
Jon: well, what if not unless there's, there's some urgency. i think they'll flip pretty quickly.
Craig: that's what i mean by while the fire is there. but the point is, you know, how long has it taken us, and we haven't yet gone to ip six?
Jon: yeah. well, that's because ip six is just complex, and it's not needed yet. it's not urgent.
Craig: i'm just saying how many years has it been out there?
Jon: yeah. but it's not urgent. if your data's if your data is
Craig: time, we're all gonna run out of ip address. we gotta do it, create it, and gotta move forward to it. and now it was like, yeah. okay. whatever. that's my point being is that unless there's a real need
Jon: oh, yeah.
Craig: people don't wanna do this. and you think about all the cash registers, all the pos systems, all like, there's millions and millions of computers that need to be updated. we're not talking about, you know, a software update. we're talking about, you know, millions and millions of computers across the internet in all sorts of shapes and forms that will need to be updated for this. so it's gonna take a while, and the solution has to be, you know, standardized before people will jump to it. but i think we're gonna see that 20 timeline shrink because this is where we are now. but where are we gonna be in five years, and what are we gonna be breaking? and people say, oh, that twenty years is now five years. let's we gotta start doing something.
Jon: yeah.
Craig: so let us know what you think around quantum and encryption and where we're going. should we start to worry about this? should we be looking at other standards? should we be worrying about harvest now and decrypt later techniques that people are having? give us your thoughts.
More from Silicon Scoop
All episodes
silicon-scoop · November 6, 2026
Spirit AI’s Robot Brain Breakthrough: Moz1, Embodied AI and China’s 2027 Race
The Spirit AI robot brain is one of the biggest bets on fixing that. Spirit AI is a Beijing startup. Its co-founder and chief scientist, Gao Yang,
View episode

silicon-scoop · November 5, 2026
OpenAI IPO Delayed to 2027 as Rogue AI Agents and Safety Failures Reshape the Market
OpenAI IPO delay explained: Sam Altman rules out 2026 as GPT-6 Astra safety tests and a $278B cash gap loom. Learn what founders should take away.
View episode

silicon-scoop · November 4, 2026
Anthropic’s AI Economy Model: 2030 Jobs, Wages, GDP and Market Risks
Anthropic AI economy model forecasts 2030 GDP, jobs and wages, while AI unemployment projections and labor-share risks challenge policymakers.
View episode
